What does Bosseo say Lead Attribution shows?+
Bosseo’s public product page says it shows a lead’s channel, referrer, landing page, device, session detail and intake answers, and describes calls and outcomes joining the journey. Ask for a consultation-specific demonstration before deciding whether the scope fits your firm.
Can it tell us whether an inquiry came from Dickinson?+
The public page describes source and landing-page information, but it does not establish a particular Dickinson configuration for your firm. Ask how geographic context would be represented and avoid treating the city’s population as proof of demand or lead volume.
Does it cover phone calls?+
Bosseo’s public page says phone calls can join the same journey record, including the transcript, case-type tag and web journey. Confirm the call-handling scope and data access that would apply to your firm.
Do we need to change our intake process?+
Bosseo says attribution runs behind the scenes on the website and intake tools and that staff do not need to manage manual tagging. Your firm should still review its intake questions, outcome definitions, ownership and confidentiality requirements before implementation.
How is this different from aggregate analytics?+
Bosseo describes Lead Attribution as connecting a specific journey to a lead and intake information, while its public page characterizes analytics as anonymous traffic in aggregate. Ask how the proposed setup distinguishes a journey, an inquiry and a signed matter.
Can it prove which channel produced revenue?+
Bosseo’s public page describes outcome tracking through consultation and signed case and says attribution connects marketing activity to signed cases. That is a product claim, not a guarantee about your records. Confirm how your firm will enter, update and review outcomes.