What is Bosseo Video Intake?+
Bosseo’s public product page describes Video Intake, identified there as CLIONT, as a guided video survey that lives on a law firm’s website. Visitors answer questions by case type, and the inquiry is intended to reach the firm with qualification information attached.
How is it different from a contact form?+
A conventional form asks a visitor to enter contact details and describe a situation. The public Video Intake description presents a guided, branching experience with video and practice-area questions. Whether that is better for your firm should be tested against your actual visitors, rules and follow-up capacity.
Can a Hamtramck-serving firm use different paths for different matters?+
Bosseo says each practice area can have its own qualification path. A firm should decide which paths it needs and whether location changes eligibility or routing. Hamtramck’s population does not determine how many paths are appropriate.
Where do completed inquiries go?+
Bosseo’s public page describes delivery to a team with answers attached and lists inbox, CRM and case-management routing in its product description. The exact destination, access, configuration and scope should be confirmed during consultation rather than assumed.
Does Video Intake replace attorney review or conflict checking?+
No conclusion on representation should be automated merely because a visitor completes a survey. The firm must define attorney review, conflict procedures, urgency handling, disclaimers and follow-up. Video Intake can organize information; it does not replace the firm’s legal and operational decisions.
What should the firm measure?+
Start with stages the firm can define consistently: intake started, completed, routed, reviewed, contacted, qualified, declined or referred, and retained if the firm chooses to track that final stage. Do not use illustrative calculator assumptions as a baseline or promise.