What does the ROI Dashboard say it tracks?+
Bosseo’s public product page describes live keyword rankings, Top 3 and Top 10 counts, SERP features, AI-engine citations, inbound calls, call transcripts, case-type tags, lead classifications, forms, video intakes, source attribution, reviews and trends over time. Confirm the exact scope and definitions for your firm during the consultation.
Can it prove that a Campbellsville search produced a signed case?+
It may help organize the path from source and page to contact, intake and matter, but the firm should not treat a ranking or call as proof of a signed case. Ask how attribution and matter records would be connected, what staff must enter, and what evidence is available at each stage.
Should Campbellsville and Taylor County be one geographic view?+
Not automatically. Campbellsville is a municipality recorded in Taylor County. Decide whether the firm wants separate city and county views, a broader Kentucky view, or a deliberate combined view. Keeping scopes explicit prevents a larger geography from obscuring local interpretation.
Who should be allowed to see call and intake information?+
The firm should decide that before adoption. Ask Bosseo how users are added or removed, whether permissions differ by role, how transcripts are protected, and how access is recovered. Do not assume that a live login answers every governance requirement.
Is a live dashboard the same as a guarantee of rankings or revenue?+
No. A dashboard reports the information its measurement and attribution rules provide. Bosseo’s public page describes a live view, but live reporting does not guarantee crawling, indexing, search visibility, leads, signed matters or revenue. Use agreed acceptance criteria and review actual evidence.
What should we prepare for a Bosseo review?+
Bring your practice-area list, geographic priorities, intake stages, matter definitions, current reporting questions, intended users and access concerns. Also identify which decisions you want the dashboard to support, such as reviewing source quality or comparing case-type outcomes.