01Firm entity and geography reviewA review of how the firm name, attorneys, practice areas, Ocoee service language, Orange County references and Florida scope are represented across the site. The output should identify inconsistencies for attorney review rather than assume an office or service area.
02Answer-topic and page assessmentA decision-ready assessment of genuine legal-service questions the firm is qualified to address publicly, with attention to distinct usefulness, geographic accuracy and the risk of repetitive pages.
03Citable content recommendationsRecommendations for clear, source-led answers that explain what the firm can responsibly publish. Bosseo’s published product information supports answer-ready, factual and city-specific content; the firm should approve legal substance before publication.
04Entity, architecture and structured-data reviewA review of crawlable content, semantic structure, duplication, firm details and structured-data opportunities. Google says ordinary technical requirements and best practices remain relevant to AI features; eligibility does not guarantee display.
05English/Spanish context reviewA scope discussion about language terminology, translation review and the firm’s actual ability to respond in each language. This does not presume a language preference or promise translated service capacity.
06Observed AI citation reviewA measurement plan for recording whether the firm is observed in answers to selected genuine questions across relevant AI search experiences. Results should be treated as dated observations, not guarantees.
07Advertising and evidence review checklistA review aid for the responsible attorney covering factual support, legal-information boundaries, geographic claims, language claims, testimonials and applicable Florida advertising guidance.