01Call-quality reviewA review of each covered intake conversation against the firm’s approved quality expectations, with coaching tied to the specific interaction as described in Bosseo’s published product information.
02Conversation score and coaching notesBosseo’s published product information describes an AI score out of 100 and specific suggestions connected to the call, such as a missed question or unconfirmed callback number. Confirm the exact configuration and scoring approach in a review.
03Purpose and key-fact summaryA concise summary of what the caller wanted and extracted facts such as names, dates, charges, deadlines or jurisdictions, subject to the firm’s review of accuracy and appropriateness.
04Practice-fit and geography reviewA review scope covering city versus county, service-area fit and the intake facts the firm needs before deciding on a next step. Casselberry and Seminole County should remain distinct fields where that distinction matters.
05Language and channel comparison planA recommended reporting scope that separates stated language preference from intake channel, so the firm can decide what comparisons are valid without assuming local language demand or performance.
06Referral, decline and follow-up rubricA common quality rubric for whether the caller received an appropriate next step, including the firm’s rules for referral, decline, callback confirmation and handoff.