01Geographic and practice relevance briefA written definition of the Alachua, Alachua County and Florida jurisdictions, courts, agencies and practice areas that may qualify for review. The scope should preserve those geographic distinctions.
02Editorial acceptance standardA reviewable set of criteria for deciding whether a story creates a legal question relevant to the firm, whether the facts are sufficiently attributable, and whether publication would add useful explanation.
03Attorney-review decision pathA proposed approval, revision or rejection path that leaves publication under the firm’s control and identifies who reviews accuracy, jurisdiction, tone, privacy and advertising concerns.
04News-page content outlineA possible outline separating reported facts, source attribution, general legal context, limits on what is known, and a restrained invitation to contact the firm. This is an editorial scope, not a promise that every page will be suitable for publication.
05Website and search reviewA review of whether proposed pages can live on the firm’s domain alongside existing content, with attention to useful original copy, duplication, crawlability, semantic HTML, page experience and accurate metadata.
06Measurement and handoff planA proposed measurement discussion for connecting published pages with the firm’s existing inquiry and intake records. Any dashboard, attribution method or integration should be confirmed rather than assumed.