1. Start with the matters your Corning firm wants to evaluate
Bosseo describes Video Intake as a guided survey that lives on a law firm website. Visitors tap an intake prompt, answer questions one at a time, and receive a path built around the firm’s practice areas. The public product description says the flow can qualify by case type, urgency and fit, with weighting toward the work the firm wants to grow. That makes the first decision a matter-design question, not a population question. Corning’s recorded relationship to Tehama County gives you a clear geographic frame for the consultation: decide whether the same intake path applies to inquiries from Corning and elsewhere in the county, or whether location changes eligibility, ownership or escalation.
Recommended approach
List the practice areas you want the intake to distinguish. For each, identify the facts that determine fit, the matters that require prompt human review and the inquiries your firm does not want routed to the calendar. Ask Bosseo to show how those decisions would appear in separate question paths. Do not use Corning’s population estimate as a forecast of lead volume or case demand.
